“We think in this case, and it’s clear, most people want to use Google search. “People wanted Netscape because it was the best browser,” Walker said in an interview. He acknowledged some similarities between the cases. Walker, who was Netscape’s deputy general counsel, recalled that he was often called on to explain how Microsoft limited distribution of Netscape’s browser and helped prepare the company’s chief executive officer to testify at the trial. John Schmidtlein, now serving as Google’s lead litigator, represented several states suing Microsoft for antitrust violations and Mark Popofsky, another of the company’s antitrust advisers, represented the Justice Department in the suit. Kent Walker, Google’s chief legal officer, and Susan Creighton, a top antitrust adviser to the company, both represented Netscape Communications Corp., a Silicon Valley start up with a web browser Microsoft was accused of hindering. Yet few attorneys have experience with major monopolization trials because the government last brought suit against a tech company for antitrust violations more than 25 years ago in the Microsoft case. The Google case is the first in a series of battles over the future of the internet, as antitrust cases against Meta Platforms Inc., Inc. But back then they were on the government’s side.įor the next 10 weeks, lawyers for Alphabet Inc.’s Google will face off against federal prosecutors and state attorneys general at the same Washington DC courthouse where decades ago several worked for the Justice Department or fought side-by-side with it in the last major US monopolization case against Microsoft Corp. (Bloomberg) - Google’s defense team in the biggest tech monopolization case of the modern era includes veterans of a similarly historic US antitrust case.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |